The recent censure motion in Uganda’s Parliament targets four parliamentary commissioners who allegedly misappropriated UGX 1.7 billion. This move, led by Theodore Ssekikubo, Lwemiyaga County MP, seeks to address corruption and hold the implicated officials accountable.
The Censure Motion Drive
Leading the Charge
Theodore Ssekikubo spearheads the campaign to gather enough signatures to initiate the censure process. So far, 146 MPs out of the required one-third have supported the motion.
Challenges Faced
Despite the significant support, the motion lacks the necessary backing from Workers MPs and representatives of persons with disabilities (PWDs), contributing to a 30-signature shortfall.
Supporters and Opponents
Support from Various MPs
Prominent supporters include Jenipher Namuyangu, State Minister for Bunyoro Affairs, and Persis Namuganza, State Minister for Urbanisation. They argue for holding the commissioners accountable and ensuring the return of misused funds.
Opposition Voices
Some MPs, like Ibrahim Ssemujju of Kira Municipality, refuse to sign the petition. They believe it is unjust to fault the commissioners when the service award was approved by Parliament.
The List of Signatories
Here’s a segment of MPs who signed the censure motion:
- David Kabanda – Kasambya County, Mubende
- Bashir Lubega Ssempa – Mubende Municipality, Mubende
- Hope Grania Nakazibwe – District Woman MP, Mubende
- Pascal Mbabazi – Buwekula County, Mubende
- Wilson Museveni – Buwekula South, Mubende
- Theodore Ssekikubo – Lwemiyaga County, Ssembabule
Continuing Efforts
Call for Accountability
Supporters like Nandala Mafabi, Budadiri West MP, emphasize the need for the implicated commissioners to refund the taxpayers’ money and face the debate in Parliament.
Speaker’s Involvement
Anita Annet Among, Speaker of Parliament, has engaged with the motion’s proponents, highlighting the need to protect Parliament’s integrity.
In conclusion , the censure motion represents a crucial step towards addressing corruption within Uganda’s Parliament. While the motion has garnered substantial support, achieving the required signatures remains a challenge. The ongoing efforts reflect a broader commitment to accountability and transparency in governance.
